Mann for School Board | home
Teacher layoffs & realignment
Reply to a widely published editorial by Board members Johnson and Erickson
by Doug Mann, 11 September 2004
by Doug Mann, 28 August 2004
[Mpls] Request for release of information per MN data practices act
by Doug Mann, 01 September 2004
The 2004-2005 budget is based on estimate of 4,600 fewer students
than last year. The reassignment of 140 tenured teachers from elementary
classrooms made it possible to rehire all of the probationary teachers assigned
to elementary grade classrooms last year. The district says those reassignments were done to save the jobs of tenured teachers.
by Doug Mann, 01 September 2004
There were fewer actual students than budgeted students in the fall of 2003,
according to Strib education beat writer Steve Brandt. How many actual
teachers? How many actual teacher positions were cut at the end of the
2003-2004 school year?
by Doug Mann, 03 September 2004, (from mpls issue list)
Why is school enrollment falling? what can be done about it?
By Doug Mann, 04 September 2004 (from mpls issues list)
by Doug Mann, 05 September 2004 (mpls issues list discussion)
What can be done to reduce overexposure of students to inexperienced teachers?
by Doug Mann, 24 August 2004
Regular K-12 & Special Ed (MPS data)
by Doug Mann, 24 August 2004
Press release, 10 Aug. 2004, Minneapolis Public Schools
Comment by Doug Mann: Again, district officials say the MPS budget
for 2004-2005 called for "the reduction of more than 600 teachers."
Yet the 2004-2005 budget calls for 210 fewer full time teacher positions
than the 2003-2004 budget.
It is also noteworthy that the district reassigned 140 high-seniority
elementary teachers in order to preserve the jobs of 92 elementary
teachers with tenure (and less seniority), according to the press release.
The objective of the realignment process was to realign high-seniority
teachers out of their jobs, not to save the jobs of any tenured teachers.
Moreover, the district is doing a whole lot more teacher reshuffling than is
necessary, and the supplementary teacher reshuffling was not done with
the informed consent of the affected [tenured]teachers, which is a
violation of the teacher tenure act, in my opinion.
Email received from Board member Ross Taylor, 9 Aug. 2004
By Doug Mann, 10 August 2004
|